Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 00:31:24 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: BIND build knobs Message-ID: <20040924213124.GA38485@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <20040924210405.A6066@URF.trarfvf> References: <200409241342.i8ODg06a030839@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040924164730.GA4259@xor.obsecurity.org> <41545194.1030700@DougBarton.net> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0409241811490.93902@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <20040924210405.A6066@URF.trarfvf>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 09:33:22PM +0100, Doug Barton wrote:
> The other knobs I have in mind are as follows:
>
> #NO_BIND_DNSSEC= true # dnssec-{keygen|signzone}
> #NO_BIND_LWRESD= true # lwresd
> #NO_BIND_NAMED= true # named, named-check{conf|zone},
> rndc[-confgen]
> #NO_BIND_UTILS= true # dig, host, nslookup, nsupdate
>
> At the bay area bsdcon developer's conference, it was agreed that we
> would introduce these knobs for 5-RELEASE, and in HEAD we would turn
> some of them off by default. The likely candidates for swithing from
> install by default to install on demand are named and the dnssec stuff.
>
> I'm open to other names for the install on demand knobs. I thought that
> emulating the ports syntax would make the intentions more clear to the
> users, but I'm ok with whatever folks think will work well.
>
These names all look fine to me.
Cheers,
--
Ruslan Ermilov
ru@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFBVJIsqRfpzJluFF4RAvWKAJ9h8maAGJUXZmziVKmcQltp2C4tngCeIV81
vsCuN9aCdG5M6sQ/CL0ti1A=
=mZKP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040924213124.GA38485>