Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:08:27 +0200 From: Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de> To: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: status of autotuning freebsd for 9.2 Message-ID: <520E325B.2090804@omnilan.de> In-Reply-To: <trinity-0aface3a-147f-4fc1-ab62-a2c25cedce96-1374003773426@3capp-gmx-bs30> References: <51D90B9B.9080209@ixsystems.com> <51D92826.1070707@freebsd.org> <51E1061F.3050804@ixsystems.com> <51E398F3.40008@freebsd.org> <51E3EEAA.3040106@freebsd.org> <51E3EFA8.1050606@ixsystems.com> <20130715141300.GA1986@glenbarber.us> <51E41419.3040503@ixsystems.com>, <CAOaKuAVxApLLntQ0dqtGWGveveFXyHd6D_%2BVtG%2BfctszKnwF4Q@mail.gmail.com> <trinity-0aface3a-147f-4fc1-ab62-a2c25cedce96-1374003773426@3capp-gmx-bs30>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Bezüglich Pascal Drecker's Nachricht vom 16.07.2013 21:42 (localtime): > ... > >>>> IMHO, this is considered a new feature, and not a critical bug > fix. re@ > >>> asked from the start of the code slush to avoid new features, and > at > >>> this point, it is too late. It is not worth introducing possible > >>> regressions, which will only delay the 9.2-RELEASE. > >>> > >>> Glen > >>> > >>> OK, then we need a release notes telling people a sane value for > >> nmbclusters and friends so that they know how to make 10gigE work. > >> > >> I'll poll my team for a value if someone else has one, that would be > even > >> better. > >> > >> -- > >> Alfred Perlstein > >> VP Software Engineering, iXsystems > > > > > >Is there a possibility that a separate unofficial patch set could be > >released for people who want the autotuning but do not want to run 9 > >stable after 9.2 is released. > >I would like the autotuning, but i am a little reluctent to use other > >stable stuff i will get when tracking stable. > > > >Regards > >Johan > > Hi, > > I think that's a good point. > > In our company, it�s not allowed to use the stable tree for any > production system. Little and useful patches are still allowed. > > Having a central point with a description of each patch it would be > much easier to update the release version with the needed patches. You're welcome using my "deploy-tools" patchsets. I'm deploying RELENG only, but with local patchset-policy. Originally, these are automtically handled during build-process with deploy-tools, but of course you can selective/manually apply the desired patches from the "local-patches" directory: ftp://ftp.omnilan.de/pub/FreeBSD/OmniLAN/deploy-tools/ Best regards, -Harry [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlIOMmkACgkQLDqVQ9VXb8iJDgCfa/vzlPEUC/KjMAMV6S5h2cx1 urYAoIf9gp7i7Gzy9i+Sn0uZPKKaRcjG =8Gcl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?520E325B.2090804>