Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 15:54:06 -0400 From: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> To: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Time Problem in 5.0 Message-ID: <3EA9925E.30201@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <448ytye5xj.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <20030424214413.GC90097@grimoire.chen.org.nz> <20030425091950.GA558@dhumketu.homeunix.net> <3EA92FF1.30809@potentialtech.com> <20030425184813.GA674@dhumketu.homeunix.net> <448ytye5xj.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Shantanu Mahajan <shantanoo@ieee.org> writes: >>| Also, ntpdate is depreciated. You should be using ntpd with the >>| proper switches/configuration. >> ntpdate was working *perfectly* with >> 4.7R,4.8-Stable. > > > So? That's a significantly different version. > > Are you *sure* you want to be running 5.0? > It doesn't sound like you're much of a debugger yourself, and it's not > as though 5.x is recommended for anybody else yet... I'm going to repeat myself here: ntpdate is depreciated. The functionality in it is duplicated by ntpd. It shouldn't even be in the 5.0 tree. I'm considering filing a pr to request that it be removed. Opinions? -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EA9925E.30201>