Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2020 22:55:25 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 243030] news/husky*: Update ports to latest versions Message-ID: <bug-243030-7788-Py3yPyAHP2@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-243030-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-243030-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D243030 --- Comment #17 from Oleg Sharoyko <osharoiko@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Ruslan Suleimanov from comment #16) 20191207 is what the name of the distfile has: husky-all-1.9-source-20191207 2019-12-05 is the string hardcoded in some source files: # grep -r 2019-12 work/ work/husky-1.9.20191207/sqpack/cvsdate.h:char cvs_date[]=3D"2019-12-06"; work/husky-1.9.20191207/hpt/h/cvsdate.h:char cvs_date[]=3D"2019-12-05"; work/husky-1.9.20191207/fidoconf/cvsdate.h:char cvs_date[]=3D"2019-12-05"; work/husky-1.9.20191207/htick/h/cvsdate.h:char cvs_date[]=3D"2019-12-05"; Perhaps snapshot of source tree for this version was taken a couple days be= fore release distfile was built. I don't think port should update this - it's wh= at authors put into the distfile.=20 If you had my previous patch applied then new version will indeed leave some files untouched. It should still apply clean to the head of the ports tree.= If this is not what concerned you please describe what a bit more detailed (ca= n do it in Russian if that's easier, I'm just trying to keep main discussion in English in case someone will follow along this bug later). I will probably make another version of the patch as I have found a nicer w= ay to handle one caveat. Regards, Oleg --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-243030-7788-Py3yPyAHP2>