Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:28:59 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <TrimYourCc@NUXI.com> To: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for me...) Message-ID: <20010212172859.N3038@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200102130121.f1D1LwW33639@harmony.village.org>; from imp@harmony.village.org on Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 06:21:58PM -0700 References: <200102130105.f1D15aU56009@mobile.wemm.org> <200102130121.f1D1LwW33639@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 06:21:58PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <200102130105.f1D15aU56009@mobile.wemm.org> Peter Wemm writes:
> : Personally, I think we place far too much weight on the major number thing.
> : I think we should be allowed to bump it when the alternative is 'major pain'
> : to developers.
>
> The more I think about this, the more that I think that you are right.
> I'd go farther and also say that we won't produce a
> libcompat/libc.so.5.uu or any other "current only" libc versions.
Huh?? We've never made a compat lib of a -current shared lib before.
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010212172859.N3038>