Date: 11 Jun 2002 14:40:54 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Looking for comments on a new utility... Message-ID: <xzpr8jec7jd.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20020611051517.A87966@FreeBSD.ORG> References: <20020611051517.A87966@FreeBSD.ORG>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> writes: > ps(1)'s internals, however, didn't seem quite right to me, but after about > 10 minutes reading kvm(3) manpages and recalling some tricks with recursive > programming to produce an N-level tree with as many as N-1 elements, I had > come up with a simple utility to print out a "process tree". Don't do anything in ps(1) that depends on libkvm. It has to be doable with sysctl as well. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpr8jec7jd.fsf>