Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 14:51:53 -0400 From: "Rex A. Roof" <rex@rexroof.com> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: -current buildkernel problems. Message-ID: <20000802145152.A94276@rexroof.com> In-Reply-To: <20000802113857.A41635@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@freebsd.org on Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 11:38:57AM -0700 References: <20000802120419.A93439@rexroof.com> <20000802113857.A41635@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
ok, here's the output from uname -a FreeBSD shaolin.wccnet.org 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #2: Thu Apr 27 19:04:53 EDT 2000 rex@shaolin.wccnet.org:/usr/src/sys/compile/SHAOLIN i386 usually, in the past, I've found the best way to upgrade (and, what I thought was the proper way) was to make a new kernel, reboot on it, and then build world is that not the right away? -Rex On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 11:38:57AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 12:04:19PM -0400, Rex A. Roof wrote: > > /tmp/ccv99837.s: Assembler messages: > > /tmp/ccv99837.s:772: Error: operands given don't match any known 386 instruction > > /tmp/ccv99837.s:837: Error: operands given don't match any known 386 instruction > > After searching the mailing lists (this one) again, > > I found that the answer was to use the newest gcc, and that I probably > > Not GCC, Binutils (assembler and linker). Of course you've told us > nothing that allows us to help you. The output from ``uname -a'' being > the most important. Also why reather than build and install the various > bits you will have to in order to compile a -current kernel, you don't > just do a ``make world'' first. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000802145152.A94276>