Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Nov 2015 20:47:23 +1100
From:      Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org>
To:        =?UTF-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=c3=b8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: OpenSSH HPN
Message-ID:  <5641BD2B.1090902@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <86io5a9ome.fsf@desk.des.no>
References:  <86io5a9ome.fsf@desk.des.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/11/2015 8:42 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Some of you may have noticed that OpenSSH in base is lagging far behind
> the upstream code.
> 
> The main reason for this is the burden of maintaining the HPN patches.
> They are extensive, very intrusive, and touch parts of the OpenSSH code
> that change significantly in every release.  Since they are not
> regularly updated, I have to choose between trying to resolve the
> conflicts myself (hoping I don't break anything) or waiting for them to
> catch up and then figuring out how to apply the new version.
> 
> Therefore, I would like to remove the HPN patches from base and refer
> anyone who really needs them to the openssh-portable port, which has
> them as a default option.  I would also like to remove the NONE cipher
> patch, which is also available in the port (off by default, just like in
> base).
> 
> DES
> 

I for one, support our new consistent-with-upstream,
improved-productivity and lower-risk-for-regressions-in-base overlords.

./koobs



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5641BD2B.1090902>