Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:03:18 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Dag-Erling =?utf-8?b?U23DuHJncmF2?= <des@des.no> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, freebsd-security@freebsd.org, amd64@freebsd.org, Igor <runixd@gmail.com> Subject: Re: nx-bit and TPM Message-ID: <20070330100318.wbqww1rilcksskok@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <86648johpj.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <e318b01b0703291334q1e05eda4y36cdd8a86cb3c597@mail.gmail.com> <86648johpj.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> (from Thu, 29 Mar 2007 =20 23:36:24 +0200): > Igor <runixd@gmail.com> writes: >> I'm was looking through handbook and wikipedia and it appears FreeBSD >> doesn't support hardware (nor software) nx bit. >> There also doesn't seem to be any support for TPM (Trusted Platform Modul= e). > > I believe NX support was never implemented because Intel's version of > AMD64 didn't support it. As for TPM, I don't see the point. This should not stop us in using it on amd64 if available. I think one =20 of the problem was/is the lack of time/man-power. So if someone comes =20 up with a good (enough) implementation which works on our supported =20 hardware, I don't think it will be rejected. Regarding TPM: there are good an bad uses for it. As our policy is to =20 provide possibilities and not to force policies on our users, I don't =20 see a reason why we will not incorporate good code regarding this. I =20 also think that we don't have it, as nobody needed it or wasn't =20 allowed to contribute code. But all this is better suited for arch@ I think (or maybe amd64@ in =20 case of NX). Bye, Alexander. --=20 "If a camel flies, no one laughs if it doesn't get very far." =09=09-- Paul White http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070330100318.wbqww1rilcksskok>