Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 30 Jul 2000 14:47:12 -0700
From:      "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com>
To:        Lars Eighner <eighner@io.com>
Cc:        Ben Smithurst <ben@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: docs/20298: man 5 keymap missing in 4.1 (Stable) 
Message-ID:  <81112.964993632@localhost>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "30 Jul 2000 12:50:41 CDT." <86ya2jh5hq.fsf@dumpster.io.com> 

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

> BS>  Yes, we know.  PR 19995.  You do realize that the manpage will be
> BS> included a lot sooner if you wrote a keymap(5) page?  Even if it
> BS> wasn't perfect, it would provide a starting point for someone to
> BS> clean it up.
> 
> You do realize if I had any idea what the page was supposed to look
> like - or how to find that out - I wouldn't be asking.  The only
> example of a keymap(5) page I can find is for minix, which might as
> well be Greek so far as its relevance to FreeBSD is concerned.

I think Ben was simply expressing (and suffering from) some of the
Usual Frustration(tm) we all feel about a surplus of PRs and a
shortage of the kinds of code donations which help close those PRs.

While both he and I respect the fact that you cared enough about the
problem to submit two different PRs on the subject, I think we also
see it from the same perspective: All the available statistical
evidence we have on PRs strongly indicates that in a volunteer-driven
environment, annoyance or lack of satisfaction with a problem is the
biggest driving factor in getting that problem fixed and it's sort of a
non-transferable resource.

In other words, it's not vindictiveness which drove Ben to throw the
PR back in your face but the simple weight of statistical evidence
which claims that you're now the most likely person in the entire
FreeBSD community to fix the problem. Tag, you're it. :-)

> I'm not going through a checklist: "Aha, man page missing, 5 points
> off!"  I attempted to pull up the page because it seemed to me it

Hmmm...  A scoring system!  Even though I know it's unworkable, I find
the idea strangely compelling. :)

> might contain particular information (the list of valid values that
> can be plugged into the keymap tables) that I needed and that I did
> not know how to discover otherwise.  I still don't know how to
> discover that information otherwise.

I think you'd be just as "correct" to submit a series of diffs against
the other man pages which remove the dead reference.  A man page which
hasn't been written, however good the author's intentions, should not
be referenced in that author's other man pages and nobody would
dispute the fact (where at least checked-in sources are concerned).

Another option, if you're feeling especially stubborn (hoo-ah!), would
be to go read through the syscons code to figure out what the heck the
keymap(5) man page should look like.  I think kbdcontrol -d also dumps
out a pretty reasonable looking keymap file which you could always
document the format of (it's ASCII, how hard can that be? :).  Other
man pages in /usr/share/man/man5 will serve as reasonable templates
for it, so you don't even need to be particularly fluent with mandoc
format to pull it off.

- Jordan



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message



help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?81112.964993632>