Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 20:31:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Ambrisko <ambrisko@ambrisko.com> To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with sata drive Message-ID: <200409200331.i8K3Vlfn020744@ambrisko.com> In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.0.20040919191030.07238138@64.7.153.2>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Tancsa writes: | At 05:04 PM 19/09/2004, S?ren Schmidt wrote: | >Uro? Gruber wrote: | >>Hello! | >>I've notice that freebsd from beta4 does not recognize my sata 150 drive | >>anymore. With beta3 it works now with beta4 or beta5 there's only udma33. | >>I have ICH6 chipset, is there anything I can do. here is my dmesg output | > | >The ICH6 is not supported yet (ENOHW), so it will show up as a generic ATA | >controller. However since all SATA controllers (at least until we get | >SATA-II) always run the interface at 150MB/s thats what you will get no matter | | Hi, | Are there big differences between the ICH5 and ICH6 controllers | ? I have one of these boards and it seems to work fine if I add a def for | it in ata-pci.h and ata-chipset.c. Also what does ENOHW mean ? I didnt | find it in google. ICH5/ICH6 are basically the same thing with these device ID's: case 0x25a38086: /* Intel 6300ESB SATA */ case 0x25b08086: /* Intel 6300ESB SATA RAID */ These SATA parts have the same registers and all from what I've experienced and tests. I developed my stuff on ICH6 (6300ESB). Doug A.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200409200331.i8K3Vlfn020744>