Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:35:57 -0400
From:      George Neville-Neil <gnn@neville-neil.com>
To:        huanghwh <huanghwh@yahoo.com>
Cc:        "eclipse@freebsd.org" <eclipse@freebsd.org>
Subject:   =?utf-8?Q?Re=3A_=E5=9B=9E=E5=A4=8D=EF=BC=9A_Moving_eclipse-devel?= =?utf-8?Q?_to_eclipse?=
Message-ID:  <1AEFA579-91DB-4436-8FB2-27234EEC3AC9@neville-neil.com>
In-Reply-To: <1376899438.36396.YahooMailNeo@web15304.mail.cnb.yahoo.com>
References:  <1376871829.53222.YahooMailNeo@web15306.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> <DA3E520F-6E73-46F8-8A7F-54F2576AF2B2@neville-neil.com> <1376899438.36396.YahooMailNeo@web15304.mail.cnb.yahoo.com>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail


On Aug 19, 2013, at 4:03 , huanghwh <huanghwh@yahoo.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 发件人: George Neville-Neil <gnn@neville-neil.com>
> 收件人: huanghwh <huanghwh@yahoo.com> 
> 抄送: "eclipse@freebsd.org" <eclipse@freebsd.org> 
> 发送日期: 2013年8月19日, 星期一, 10:58 上午
> 主题: Re: Moving eclipse-devel to eclipse
> 
> 
> 
> On Aug 18, 2013, at 20:23 , huanghwh <huanghwh@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> On 2013/08/19 04:07, George Neville-Neil wrote:
>>> 
>>> This work is nearly done.  I've tested locally and the new eclipse, formerly eclipse-devel, installs and runs.
>>> Since this is now going to be eclipse instead of devel I am planning to commit this port with 
>>> a .1  PORTREVISION.  That would make eclipse show up as: eclipse-4.2.0_1 Does that make sense to everyone?
>>> I often used eclipse-devel and got two main problems of our eclipse-devel:
>>> 
>>> 1.  eclipse is very slow switching editors, especially XML: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=391868
>>> 2.  If install EMF SDK from juno repository, all of installed
>>>     plug-in will be disable.
>>> 
>>>   Maybe the better way is:  Switch to eclipse from eclipse-devel
>>>     after eclipse-devel upgrade to 4.2.2 or 4.3.
>> 
>> Have you filed PRs for these issues?  The first issue has a patch available so that could be applied in the
>> eclipse area after the move.  The second one I don't anything about.  Has it been discussed here before?
> NO, I suppose no way to fixed it except upgrade to 4.2.2 as our eclipse-devel use old 
> version EMF  Core Runtime 2.8.0,  I will filed PR anyway.
>> 
>> I'd like to get eclipse out of the way as it's very very old, and then fix bugs in the new eclipse while porting
>> the newest eclipse-devel.  I do not want to block the move on bugs that have patches.
> OK.

OK, it's all on my todo list.

Best,
George



home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1AEFA579-91DB-4436-8FB2-27234EEC3AC9>