Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 17:26:10 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: panic: LK_RETRY set with incompatible flags Message-ID: <51127612.8000305@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1502349220.2745137.1360163749334.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> References: <1502349220.2745137.1360163749334.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 06/02/2013 17:15 Rick Macklem said the following: > Well, zfs_vget() returns EOPNOTSUPP for .zfs, so the NFS server knows to > switch over to using VOP_LOOKUP(). If the .zfs/snapshot and .zfs/share > do the same thing, that should be fine, at least for the NFS server, > I think. Ah, right, but again this is done only for .zfs and .zfs/snapshot. .zfs/shares is not special-cased and thus is problematic here too in the same fashion as zfs_fhtovp. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51127612.8000305>