Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 12:38:09 +0000 From: Rasputin <rasputin@submonkey.net> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wi0 problems under latest STABLE Message-ID: <20020312123809.A56376@shikima.mine.nu> In-Reply-To: <20020311185911.6508A3F0E@bast.unixathome.org>; from dan@langille.org on Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 01:59:09PM -0500 References: <20020311182959.9E2863F0E@bast.unixathome.org>; <20020311105627.A9391@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <20020311185911.6508A3F0E@bast.unixathome.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> [020311 19:49]: > On 11 Mar 2002 at 10:56, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 01:29:58PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote: > > > Both machines get the "wi0: timeout in wi_cmd 11; event status 8000" > > > message. Both have the above settings compiled into the kernel. > > > > > > Is there a way I can confirm those settings or adjust them at run time? > > At this point there isn't. I I'm going to have to rethink handling this > > problem. It appears that WI_TIMEOUT is actually too long (it hangs the > > machine for WI_TIMEOUT*WI_DELAY if the command doesn't return). > > Additionaly, it appears that some cards are just broken and we need to find > > a way to deal with them. > Feel free to direct patches to me and I will try them. You can add me to the list too, I probably came across as a bit of a whinger the other day but I'm more than happy to help track down any bugs. Thanks for your efforts. -- If you can't learn to do it well, learn to enjoy doing it badly. Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns :: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020312123809.A56376>