Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:35:08 +0100 From: Franco Fichtner <franco@lastsummer.de> To: Kirill Ponomarev <kp@krion.cc> Cc: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>, glebius@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD CURRENT stabilization cycle Message-ID: <91396025-EF43-425A-BA9A-47BF20564A87@lastsummer.de> In-Reply-To: <ZdnYOpsfOxFdRUwm@krion.cc> References: <ZdnYOpsfOxFdRUwm@krion.cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, And whom do you want to =E2=80=9Estab=E2=80=9C with this? ;) Why not do the same thing that ports does and call this =E2=80=9Emonthly=E2=80= =9C which is pretty much what it is and easy to understand and you can have o= ne build at the end of that week? Cheers, Franco > On 24. Feb 2024, at 12:51, Kirill Ponomarev <kp@krion.cc> wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFOn 02/23, Mark Millard wrote: >> Gleb Smirnoff <glebius_at_freebsd.org> wrote on >> Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 04:32:52 UTC : >>=20 >>> More seriously speaking, I >>> actually hope that in some future snapshots.FreeBSD.org will start using= these >>> points for snapshot generation. >>=20 >> How about also the likes of: >>=20 >> https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:aarch64/stabweek/ >>=20 >> for pkgbase (various "aarch64" replacements too)? >=20 > yes, great idea, base_stabweek or similar is something I'd vote for.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?91396025-EF43-425A-BA9A-47BF20564A87>