Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 20:24:15 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Motomichi Matsuzaki <mzaki@e-mail.ne.jp> Cc: luoqi@watermarkgroup.com, freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, byung@wam.umd.edu, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, joki@kuebart.stuttgart.netsurf.de Subject: Re: kern/5038: FreeBSD can't read MS Joliet CDs. Message-ID: <3719C0DF.6A8E2A29@newsguy.com> References: <199904171549.LAA23743@lor.watermarkgroup.com> <3718E187.54571571@newsguy.com> <19990418135558W.mzaki@e-mail.ne.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Motomichi Matsuzaki wrote: > > The 'mandatory + recommended' object size is no more than 5 kbytes. > The GENERIC kernel does not require necessarily > the euc-jp support or any other charsets. > I think the iso8859-1 support alone is sufficient for GENERIC. > > The custom kernels can have the euc-jp support through > the CHARSET_EUC_JP and ENCODING_EUC kernel configure option. > (They are currently defined at the top of the source files.) But are they set by default to include euc-jp? Well, that's a minor point. > Yes. sysctl is not the best idea. > > I think the charset preferences should apply on per-process basis ideally. > > The operator mounts some disks. > The users access the disks in their own preferred charset. > > The UNICODE is a multiligual codeset, > so we shoud not suppose any specific charset on the disk. > Therefore, a per-mount basis is not enough. > > If the routines can refer the users' environment 'LC_CTYPE', > it is fine idea. But it can't, I suppose. Yeah, Terry Lambert has preached on this before. My point is that I can't get the patch committed with it using a sysctl node. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "Well, Windows works, using a loose definition of 'works'..." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3719C0DF.6A8E2A29>