Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:45:09 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: When will ZFS become stable? Message-ID: <flrlln$j29$2@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20080106223153.V72782@fledge.watson.org> References: <fll63b$j1c$1@ger.gmane.org> <20080104163352.GA42835@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <9bbcef730801040958t36e48c9fjd0fbfabd49b08b97@mail.gmail.com> <200801061051.26817.peter.schuller@infidyne.com> <9bbcef730801060458k4bc9f2d6uc3f097d70e087b68@mail.gmail.com> <4780D289.7020509@FreeBSD.org> <flqmbo$eac$1@ger.gmane.org> <4780E546.9050303@FreeBSD.org> <9bbcef730801060651y489f1f9bw269d0968407dd8fb@mail.gmail.com> <4780EF09.4090908@FreeBSD.org> <flr0ie$euj$1@ger.gmane.org> <47810BE3.4080601@FreeBSD.org> <flr2lr$kph$1@ger.gmane.org> <4781113C.3090904@FreeBSD.org> <opt4i0g3k44fjv08@nuclight.avtf.net> <47814B53.50405@FreeBSD.org> <20080106223153.V72782@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Robert Watson wrote: > Actually, with mbuma, this has changed -- mbufs are now allocated from > the general kernel map. Pipe buffer memory and a few other things are > still allocated from separate maps, however. In fact, this was one of > the known issues with the introduction of large cluster sizes without > resource limits: address space and memory use were potentially > unbounded, so Randall recently properly implemented the resource limits > on mbuf clusters of large sizes. Is this related to reported panics with ZFS and a heavy network load (NFS mostly)? [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHgVn1ldnAQVacBcgRArzGAJ96QlxG3VnfACkWe7vvvQkqYc3rZQCgzCPP K1Yl643Vws2q8emoyKqk/3Y= =tLNf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?flrlln$j29$2>