Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 15:15:49 -0000 From: "Jonathan Gilpin" <jonathan@fluent.ltd.uk> To: "David Malone" <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.9 Stable Crashes on SuperMicro with SMP Message-ID: <01c901c3b4f9$57066880$62c4033e@clarity> References: <01b401c3b46d$a4ed5cc0$62c4033e@clarity> <20031127140905.GA95486@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks. Another poster has sent me a memory testing program which I will try tonight in the early hours. With 1 CPU enabled the box is completely stable. There are no memory errors of any kind and all is fine. Tonight I will enable the second CPU again and see if I can find out more infomation... Could it be that a memory fault only occurr when the second CPU is enabled (ie: when Option SMP and option APIC_IO is enabled in the kernel)? Jonathan ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Malone" <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> To: "Jonathan Gilpin" <jonathan@fluent.ltd.uk> Cc: <freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>; <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 2:09 PM Subject: Re: 4.9 Stable Crashes on SuperMicro with SMP > On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:35:49PM -0000, Jonathan Gilpin wrote: > > Further Crashes as reported before: > > Both of these crashes could potentially be caused by hardware or > memory problems. While it is possible it's a bug of some sort, I'd > start by checking out my hardware, if I were you... > > David. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01c901c3b4f9$57066880$62c4033e>