Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 18:29:08 -0600 From: Greg Lewis <glewis@misty.eyesbeyond.com> To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: shujit Message-ID: <20030617002908.GA75433@misty.eyesbeyond.com> In-Reply-To: <20030616081720.GA5855@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw> References: <xzpsmqbovzw.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030616001217.GC32125@rot13.obsecurity.org> <xzpof0y31cf.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030616081720.GA5855@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 04:17:20PM +0800, leafy wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 09:53:20AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Any objections to my picking up the maintainership on this port? I > > use it quite a bit since - unlike sobomax :) - I'm not entirely > > comfortable with JDK 1.4.1 yet, and shujit makes a big difference on > > 1.3.1's performance. > > > > DES > Do you mean it's even better than 1.3.1 w/ HotSpot? Define better :). Do you mean faster, stabler or what? I suspect that its a bit slower than HotSpot (in general) but a bit stabler, but thats just a guess :). Note that Shudo-san usually keeps up with the mailing list so he is probably interested in the patches :). -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030617002908.GA75433>