Date: 27 Jan 1998 16:50:43 +0100 From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan Smørgrav) To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> Cc: joelh@gnu.org, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: File I/O in kernel land (was: Re: 2nd warning: 2.2.6 BETA begins in 10 days!) Message-ID: <xzplnw1kjak.fsf@grjottunagard.ifi.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Mike Smith's message of "Wed, 28 Jan 1998 01:42:49 %2B1030" References: <199801271512.BAA00461@word.smith.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> writes:
> 3 establish/disestablish your own timer routine when you are
> activated/deactivated (bad again because the remove-saver option
> is hidden behind the UNKNOWN_MODE test in scrn_timer()).
>
> I would actually combine 3 above with moving the "should we stop the
> screensaver" test to before the UNKNOWN_MODE bailout in scrn_timer().
After due consideration, I think that's what I'll do.
Here's a patch to syscons.c:
--- syscons.c.orig Tue Jan 27 16:49:04 1998
+++ syscons.c Tue Jan 27 16:49:53 1998
@@ -2187,17 +2187,17 @@
scintr(0);
}
+ /* should we stop the screen saver? */
+ if (mono_time.tv_sec <= scrn_time_stamp + scrn_blank_time)
+ if (scrn_blanked > 0)
+ stop_scrn_saver(current_saver);
+
/* should we just return ? */
if ((scp->status&UNKNOWN_MODE) || blink_in_progress || switch_in_progress) {
timeout(scrn_timer, NULL, hz / 10);
splx(s);
return;
}
-
- /* should we stop the screen saver? */
- if (mono_time.tv_sec <= scrn_time_stamp + scrn_blank_time)
- if (scrn_blanked > 0)
- stop_scrn_saver(current_saver);
if (scrn_blanked <= 0) {
/* update screen image */
--
* Finrod (INTJ) * Unix weenie * dag-erli@ifi.uio.no * cellular +47-92835919 *
RFC1123: "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzplnw1kjak.fsf>