Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 23:27:25 +0000 (UTC) From: Warren Block <wblock@FreeBSD.org> To: doc-committers@freebsd.org, svn-doc-all@freebsd.org, svn-doc-head@freebsd.org Subject: svn commit: r46999 - head/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/news/status Message-ID: <201507162327.t6GNRPJk042261@repo.freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
Author: wblock Date: Thu Jul 16 23:27:24 2015 New Revision: 46999 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/doc/46999 Log: Update the Core report based on feedback. Modified: head/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/news/status/report-2015-04-2015-06.xml Modified: head/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/news/status/report-2015-04-2015-06.xml ============================================================================== --- head/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/news/status/report-2015-04-2015-06.xml Thu Jul 16 20:08:27 2015 (r46998) +++ head/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/news/status/report-2015-04-2015-06.xml Thu Jul 16 23:27:24 2015 (r46999) @@ -906,18 +906,14 @@ fairly radical ideas under discussion about how to improve the project's responsiveness to security issues.</p> - <p>Shortly after BSDCan in mid-June, Warner Losh proposed a - change to <tt>style(9)</tt> which resulted in some lively - discussion. An informal poll was conducted via Phabricator - and the change was committed within a couple of days. - Unfortunately, this did not meet with universal approval and - Core was called upon to arbitrate. Warner backed out the - change, recognizing that there had not been enough time - allowed for proper discussion. Many people were still in - transit from BSDCan, and the voting arrangements did not suit - everyone. A new poll has since been held, with votes either - by e-mail or the Slowvote facility of Phabricator. This - resulted in approval of the change by a wide margin.</p> + <p>In mid-June, a change to <tt>style(9)</tt> was proposed, and + resulted in much lively discussion. Warner Losh conducted an + informal poll with Phabricator and the change was approved and + committed within a couple of days. Unfortunately, complaints + were raised about the timing and voting methods and Core was + called upon to arbitrate. The change was backed out + voluntarily, a new poll was held with more time to vote, and + the change was approved.</p> <p>During this period we had two new commit bits awarded, and one taken in for safekeeping. Welcome aboard to Chris Torekhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201507162327.t6GNRPJk042261>