Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 16 Jul 2006 11:31:58 -0700
From:      "Matthew Jacob" <lydianconcepts@gmail.com>
To:        "Ade Lovett" <ade@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Current favorite FC HBA?
Message-ID:  <7579f7fb0607161131h19a995ffjeceda64feb4d7a7a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3B9652BC-027D-4FC5-A2E9-3CD7AF12DC4B@freebsd.org>
References:  <813466C3-8E34-4886-9689-044086F4F64C@dragondata.com> <7376DAAA-4C67-495F-A532-5A86C47E8F75@FreeBSD.org> <7579f7fb0607140806q1cf1baf4q24a6f2ec14118a54@mail.gmail.com> <3B9652BC-027D-4FC5-A2E9-3CD7AF12DC4B@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/16/06, Ade Lovett <ade@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> On Jul 14, 2006, at 08:06 , Matthew Jacob wrote:
> > The 234X will be EOL'd I hear by the end of the year.
>
> Shame.  Nice cards.  Got any suggestions for new gear?

I'm trying to get the 2422 support complete.

>
> > SCSI drives aren't that much cheaper.
>
> We've found that given the bigger market share of SCSI as opposed to
> FCAL drives, whilst the price differential between SCSI and FCAL is
> minimal, in terms of acquiring the hardware, the JBOD chassis, and
> the inevitable RMAs, SCSI wins hands down.

Oh, that's probably true, yes.

>
> I'd love to go complete FCAL, but right now it just doesn't really
> seem to be an option.  More's the pity :(
>

Wait a year. SAS/SATA will blow both away for nearline.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7579f7fb0607161131h19a995ffjeceda64feb4d7a7a>