Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:56:53 +0900
From:      "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>
To:        kientzle@acm.org
Cc:        Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de>, libh@FreeBSD.ORG, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: BOF at BSDCon: FreeBSD Installer, Packages System
Message-ID:  <39FE26E5.BDCC6CCD@newsguy.com>
References:  <39DCC860.B04F7D50@acm.org> <20001006155542.A29218@cichlids.cichlids.com> <39F3CDD7.15B889E7@acm.org> <20001023190412.B507@cichlids.cichlids.com> <39F47E98.4BB647AA@acm.org> <20001023202244.B10374@cichlids.cichlids.com> <39F48F4A.38D458C2@acm.org> <39FCF244.5A8C8E59@newsguy.com> <39FDC12E.304B0011@acm.org> <39FDE2A0.C2CEF041@acm.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tim Kientzle wrote:
> 
> I just did a few quick tests against my FreeBSD 3.3
> system to see how much you lose by switching from
> tar.gz to ZIP.  I simply archived a couple of directories
> and compared the sizes:
> 
> Directory           tar.gz         ZIP
> /usr/ports       7,601,675  15,008,530
> /usr/src        50,896,742  62,536,891
> /usr/bin         3,892,391   6,192,116
> /usr/share/man  28,449,979  22,518,970 (!)

I assume you used maximum compression for tar.gz. Did you use maximum
compression for ZIP?

-- 
Daniel C. Sobral			(8-DCS)
dcs@newsguy.com
dcs@freebsd.org
capo@world.wide.bsdconspiracy.net

		He has been convicted of criminal possession of a clue with intent to
distribute.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39FE26E5.BDCC6CCD>