Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Nov 1997 19:40:02 +0100
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
To:        Stephen Roome <steve@visint.co.uk>
Cc:        freebsd-smp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: rc564 on SMP 
Message-ID:  <20588.879964802@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 19 Nov 1997 18:10:58 GMT." <Pine.BSF.3.95.971119174808.15331D-100000@dylan.visint.co.uk> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.3.95.971119174808.15331D-100000@dylan.visint.co.uk>, Steph
en Roome writes:

>My desktop P166 (32Mb Ram) not much load at the moment is doing
>200kkeys/sec.
>
>With 2 processes running on a dual processor P133, each process is doing
>180kkeys/sec.
>
>The thing about this is that a p133 doing something like this that I would
>have thought of as processor intensive should only get 133/166 the speed
>of a P166 (okay so that's obvious).
>
>But 180,000 / 133 * 166 is 224,000.
>
>i.e. FreeBSD-SMP on very similar hardware here seems to be actually
>outperforming my desktop system. Maybe it's late in the day and I'm
>missing something obvious, but it's a nice sign to go home on. =)

This is not really CPU limited, but to a large extent CPU <--> RAM 
speed limited.  You probably have different chipsets and or RAM type
in the two machines.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp             FreeBSD coreteam member
phk@FreeBSD.ORG               "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20588.879964802>