Date: Sun, 27 Jul 1997 05:52:30 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: ache@nagual.pp.ru Cc: peter@spinner.dialix.com.au, max@wide.ad.jp, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/apache Makefile ports/www/apache/filesMakefile Makefile.SSL md5 md5.SSL ports/www/apache/patchespatch-aa patch-ab patch-ac patch-ad patch-ae patch-af patch-agpatch-ah ports/www/apache/patches.SSL patch-aa patch-ab patch-ac ... Message-ID: <199707271252.FAA01116@blimp.mimi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970727160123.9228A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net> (message from =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= on Sun, 27 Jul 1997 16:10:10 %2B0400 (MSD))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* It is better to relay on some logic in separation process rather than * just version numbers, i.e. for Apache port stable and current variants * always exists, so it is good point for splitting regardless of numbers. I see. Yes, if there are always clear-cut stable and current variants, that is probably better. * It is clear that it is separated, but not clear WHY, prefix must specify * separation reason. Well, it seems to me that people can tell that "apache-current" is separated because it is a bleeding-edge version, and "apache-ssl" is separated because it has ssl support. Doesn't that make it rather clear that "apache" is called just that because it doesn't contain either characteristics? :) Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199707271252.FAA01116>