Date: Mon, 8 Dec 1997 16:45:08 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: dg@root.com Cc: Mikael Karpberg <karpen@ocean.campus.luth.se>, nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams), hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [hackers:] Architectural advice needed Message-ID: <199712082345.QAA13824@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199712082331.PAA24811@implode.root.com> References: <199712082228.XAA00434@ocean.campus.luth.se> <199712082331.PAA24811@implode.root.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> just 'implements' nowadays. I think it *could* fulfill its purpose if > >> it was actually promoted/used. I would have used it in the past if I > >> thought it would be monitored, although it wasn't. Could we consider it > >> 'back in use' for questions such as Julians? > > > >It's still closed, though, no? And that's a lot less fun for people that are > >interested in, if not joining the debate, at least read it. If it's going > >to go back in use, could it at least be possible to join it "read only", > >if you are the "mere mortal" that most of us are? > > Thr original purpose of the list was for coordinating architectural > direction between the BSD old guard and FreeBSD. This simply didn't work > as intended so it should be deleted. Just because it didn't work *then* for co-ordinating stuff with CSRG doesn't mean it couldn't work *now* for co-ordinating FreeBSD stuff that happens currently between just a couple folks. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199712082345.QAA13824>