Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Oct 1997 11:20:18 +0100
From:      Damian Hamill <damian@cablenet.net>
To:        "Felipe Rivera M." <felipe@informador.com.mx>
Cc:        freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Recomendatios for a good way to set a modem poll to provide access?
Message-ID:  <344C81E2.6201DD56@cablenet.net>
References:  <344B85A5.63942B29@informador.com.mx>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Felipe Rivera M. wrote:
> 
>     Hi there
> 
>     Not so much time ago in this list i red a good discussion on
> livingston portmaster's VS ascend access servers (livingston got the
> best comments) and now my question is:
> 
>     Do you recomend access servers from other companies? (cisco? are
> there any others?)
> how reliable is a FreeBSD box with a multiport card and modems and pppd?

It's very reliable, it is freebsd after all.  I've been happy with my
term server setup and had no problems with it since moving away from
linux.  The problem with this setup is the modem rack and the multiport
card and it becomes an issue of density.  For small isps with less than
100 lines it is manageable but beyond that they take up too much space.  
I have a rack mount PC and the modem rack which take up 11u and provide
capacity for 48 analogue only lines.  My new PM3 takes up 2u of space
and supports 60 analogue or ISDN calls.

If someone were to come up with a PCI card that does the same job as the
PM3 then it would be an absolute winner.  The one advantage that a
freebsd term server has over an access servers is the programming
capability.

regards
damian

-- 
*    Damian Hamill   M.D.       damian@cablenet.net
* CableNet & The Landscape Channel
* http://www.cablenet.net/   http://www.landscapetv.com/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?344C81E2.6201DD56>