Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:15:40 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC src/sys/amd64/conf GENERIC Message-ID: <20050318201540.GF54333@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <20050317121651.N72560@delplex.bde.org> References: <200503162023.j2GKNWnJ099551@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050316205406.GF591@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <20050316205829.GA3556@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050317121651.N72560@delplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 12:37:15PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: > Are the comments on precedence even correct? Yes. > I think precedence according to ordering in the config file hasn't > worked for many years. PCI devices may (should) have precedence over > ISA ones, but that is a general property and should be expressed > better. There are both PCI lnc and pcn devices. lnc and pcn can both attempt to attach to the same device -- we have code that tries to get the two drivers to live piecefully side-by-side. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050318201540.GF54333>