Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 19 May 2006 15:37:51 -0400
From:      Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
To:        Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: improving transport over lossy links ?
Message-ID:  <6.2.3.4.0.20060519153601.117978c0@64.7.153.2>
In-Reply-To: <446E1D41.9070301@mac.com>
References:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.1060520014045.15967A-100000@gaia.nimnet.asn.au> <446E1868.8020704@elischer.org> <446E1D41.9070301@mac.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 03:32 PM 19/05/2006, Chuck Swiger wrote:

>Agreed.  If you can live with doing so, using an MTU of around 512 
>worked pretty well back in the days that I was using a 19200 baud 
>DOV (data over voice modem) that tended to experience line noise & 
>hence packet drops when you got an incoming voice call; if you've 
>got a high-noise environment, well, that would be similar.
>
>Of course, you should make sure that obvious fixes like replacing 
>phone cabling or re-punching down the phone lines at your demarc 
>(assuming you have 66 or 110 blocks) doesn't help.

Thanks, unfortunately, these are very remote sites in industrial and 
rural areas where xconnect boxes tend to be rusty posts.   I will try 
a lower MTU size to see how it deals with errors.

         ---Mike 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.2.3.4.0.20060519153601.117978c0>