Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 19:59:33 +0900 From: Ganbold <ganbold@micom.mng.net> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FBSD 5.2.CURRENT-p4 and mysqld problems Message-ID: <6.0.3.0.2.20040414195314.02a5ac88@202.179.0.80> In-Reply-To: <20040414124103.6ba2b65c@Magellan.Leidinger.net> References: <20040413204833.17d23b10@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0404131448450.24460-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <20040414124103.6ba2b65c@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, So what threading library should I use with mysql? Can somebody recommend me which to use? Because I'm bit confused. I used to use linuxthreads and it was pretty good. Now there appears some other threading libraries:) Which one is reliable and has good performance? Ganbold At 07:41 PM 14.04.2004, you wrote: >On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 14:49:41 -0700 (PDT) >Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> wrote: > > > So is this with system scope threads or process scope threads? > >Whatever MySQL uses when compiled to use libpthread. > > > what is the performance like? > >It's a different system (2.4 GHz P4, vinum-stripe on 2 SATA disks >(ICH5), 1GB RAM) and the kernel is compiled with icc, so I can't >compare. But it was fast. Just some seconds to add this with the mysql >client program: > % wc nurdaten.sql > 30161 180515 4781902 nurdaten.sql > > % grep INSERT nurdaten.sql | wc -l > 30007 > >The other system (2.8 GHz P4, ATA-stripe (Promise) on 2 SATA disks, 1GB >RAM) with a -current as of March 19 needed several seconds longer (with >linuxthreads instead of pthreads). But we're comparing apples with >oranges here. > >Bye, >Alexander. > >-- > I'm available to get hired. > >http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net > GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.0.3.0.2.20040414195314.02a5ac88>