Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 18:36:56 +0900 (JST) From: Takahashi Yoshihiro <nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org> To: peter@wemm.org Cc: peter@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/include dvcfg.h physio_proc.h src/sys/amd64/include dvcfg.h physio_proc.h src/sys/compat/netbsd dvcfg.h physio_proc.h src/sys/dev/ct bshw_machdep.c ct.c ct_isa.c src/sys/dev/ncv ncr53c500.c ncr53c500_pccard.c ncr53c500hw.h ... Message-ID: <20040314.183656.71104998.nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200403132113.05474.peter@wemm.org> References: <200403131948.20774.peter@wemm.org> <20040314.125403.41652080.nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org> <200403132113.05474.peter@wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <200403132113.05474.peter@wemm.org> Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> writes: > > > > > Move the non-MD machine/dvcfg.h and machine/physio_proc.h to > > > > > a common MI area before they proliferate more. > > > > > > > > Why these are in compat/netbsd? These sure are obtained from > > > > NetBSD/pc98, but not for compatible mode with NetBSD. > > > > > > Is there a better place? I'd be happy to move them elsewhere.. > > > perhaps dev/pc98/*? compat/pc98/*? > > > > These are also not for pc98 only. I think that sys/sys is a better. > > No, sys/sys is not a dumping ground for this kind of thing. Now that > I've gone looking, I have just noticed sys/device_port.h - I am not > happy about that one being there either. It doesn't appear to be in > NetBSD either. How about sys/dev/*? I can't think where is a good place..., but it is sure that compat/netbsd is not a suitable place. --- TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro <nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040314.183656.71104998.nyan>