Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 13:23:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Adam <bsdx@looksharp.net> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a better idea for package dependencies Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005091320490.11996-100000@turtle.looksharp.net> In-Reply-To: <20000509075209.D6350@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 9 May 2000, David O'Brien wrote: >On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 06:30:17PM -0400, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote: >> Actually, it has to do with the pkg_ commands, which I believe are built >> when you make world... > >yes. > >> and aren't part of the ports, > >And are only used for Ports. Thus their behavior defines the behavior of >the Ports Collection. Thus it is a Ports issue. IF the pkg_* utils were >ports, how would you install them?? > >-- David (obrien@NUXI.com) Am I missing something? I thought ports only need some .mk files and make? (Along with tools to get those there, including the port itself, at most fetch or ftp, and tar?) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0005091320490.11996-100000>