Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:34:50 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/i386/net htonl.S ntohl.S Message-ID: <20041018183450.GB80703@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20041018180319.GD89681@ip.net.ua> References: <200410181719.i9IHJa9l097436@repoman.freebsd.org> <20041018173516.GB89681@ip.net.ua> <20041018174511.GA6079@dragon.nuxi.com> <20041018180319.GD89681@ip.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 09:03:20PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.2.1R/hardware-i386.html#PROC > > says i386 (except 386SX) is still supported. I recall phk@ Which doesn't make much sense since (AFAIK) there is no difference between 386DX and 386SX from a programmers point of view. (The difference between them is that the 386sx has a 16-bit databus and a 24-bit address bus, while the 386dx has both 32-bit, but this only affects the motherboard designers, not the people who write software.) -- <Insert your favourite quote here.> Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041018183450.GB80703>