Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 04:57:59 +0100 From: Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD CURRENT <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: uname -KU 1500001 1500000 Message-ID: <4f7fec68-2ff9-4675-badd-a60cbca9dd32@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <B431D2DD-90BD-4DC7-A4C3-0598FE839C5C@yahoo.com> References: <B431D2DD-90BD-4DC7-A4C3-0598FE839C5C.ref@yahoo.com> <B431D2DD-90BD-4DC7-A4C3-0598FE839C5C@yahoo.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 01/10/2023 23:41, Mark Millard wrote: > That indicates that __FreeBSD_version was 1500000 when the uname that > was run was built but the running kernel was built when > __FreeBSD_version was 1500001 . (Presumes a lack of use of OSVERSION > to override the getosreldate result for the kernel case.) > > What does "file /usr/bin/uname" report? Which does it list for: > > FreeBSD 15.0 (1500000) > vs. > FreeBSD 15.0 (1500001) > > ? % file /usr/bin/uname /usr/bin/uname: ELF 64-bit LSB pie executable, x86-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked, interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1, for FreeBSD 15.0 (1500001), FreeBSD-style, stripped % > …help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4f7fec68-2ff9-4675-badd-a60cbca9dd32>