Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 11:29:43 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> Cc: lstewart@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, bz@freebsd.org, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>, Ming Fu <Ming.Fu@watchguard.com> Subject: Re: kern/123095 kern/131602 sendfile Message-ID: <20100708082943.GB2439@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <4C358A01.8080206@icyb.net.ua> References: <7C3D15DD6E8F464998CA1470D8A322F302BB9F72@ES02CO.wgti.net> <20100707205041.GO13238@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4C358843.5000001@freebsd.org> <4C358A01.8080206@icyb.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 11:19:13AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 08/07/2010 11:11 Andre Oppermann said the following: > > > > Can you check whether your patch fixes the bug when you go over a real > > network? > > As I understand the patch is not supposed to fix the bug, it's supposed to catch > it early. I.e. get panic instead of data corruption. Right, the patch maps the page in sf buffer read-only (on i386 only). But note the parallel posting with m_cat() change. It is still not enough, and I am not set up for the real network testing ATM. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkw1jHYACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4gZrgCgy3Rvs07iZpz5W8tDbiFplveg MQgAoJ2EKq4E2OkIsg2ON/u6qcFQ+8Xk =oZdG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100708082943.GB2439>