Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 08:45:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu>
To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
Cc: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net>, Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: install on {Net,Open}BSD vs install on FreeBSD
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.95.960925084427.2795A-100000@gilligan.eng.umd.edu>
In-Reply-To: <199609250410.WAA10368@rocky.mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 24 Sep 1996, Nate Williams wrote: > > of the case is based on compatibility. I've disagreed with Richard in the > > past when he was using the compatibility to move us towards SYSV without a > > strong reason, but since we ARE bsd, and the -d option IS bsd, the > > The -d option *ISN'T* BSD. It was added by J.T. in NetBSD, and when > OpenBSD took the entire NetBSD source tree over it was there as well. > I'll bet BSDi doesn't have it, and neither does Ultrix, which are also > BSD based systems. And add that Sun DOES do it. I'll check ultrix. > > > Nate > ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Chuck Robey | Interests include any kind of voice or data chuckr@eng.umd.edu | communications topic, C programming, and Unix. 9120 Edmonston Ct #302 | Greenbelt, MD 20770 | I run Journey2 and n3lxx, both FreeBSD (301) 220-2114 | version 2.2 current -- and great FUN! ----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.3.95.960925084427.2795A-100000>