Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:50:01 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, Walter Venable <weaseal@gmail.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux_base-f8 giving me guff Message-ID: <20080429045001.GW18958@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0804281537p27003437p10ff1d9bf7c7bff@mail.gmail.com> References: <48164CD5.9030109@gmail.com> <790a9fff0804281537p27003437p10ff1d9bf7c7bff@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 05:37:18PM -0500, Scot Hetzel wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Walter Venable <weaseal@gmail.com> wrote: > > /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f8 $ sudo make > > ===> linux_base-f8-8_3 compat.linux.osrelease: 2.4.2 is not supported. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f8. > > > > Ok -- I get it, linux kernel 2.4.2 isn't supported. How do I get around > > this issue? I'm running 6.3-RELEASE-p2... > > sysctl compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.16 The question that seems to be relevant there is why the port refuses to install with some compat.linux.osrelease value ? Does port run some linux binary during install time (unlikely) ? I think the port should ignore even absence of the linux.ko; the value of the linux.osrelease is purely runtime issue as opposed to the install time. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkgWqPgACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4hidgCfUVutR7uRXNjqG30+imYl13oI acsAnAxo1IYjle0+O6Mxjrf38waSjCYG =8bQe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080429045001.GW18958>