Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 21:21:50 +0200 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/pseudofs pseudofs_vnops.c Message-ID: <xzpvfsupy9d.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <200308181802.h7II2XGZ013601@repoman.freebsd.org> (John Baldwin's message of "Mon, 18 Aug 2003 11:02:33 -0700 (PDT)") References: <200308181802.h7II2XGZ013601@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> writes: > Log: > The allproc lock is a sx lock, not a mutex, so fix the assertion. This > asserts that the sx lock is held, but does not specify if the lock is h= eld > shared or exclusive, thus either type of lock satisfies the assertion. My bad - but why didn't I get a warning about the incorrect pointer type? And why did the code run fine with INVARIANT_SUPPORT and INVARIANTS defined? Just lucky? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpvfsupy9d.fsf>