Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 01:36:07 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) <ache@astral.msk.su> To: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org> Cc: CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@freefall.freebsd.org>, cvs-user@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/secure/libexec/telnetd sys_term.c Message-ID: <YBNH2Ymu88@ache.dialup.demos.ru> In-Reply-To: <199510202030.NAA10249@aslan.cdrom.com>; from "Justin T. Gibbs" at Fri, 20 Oct 1995 13:30:15 -0700 References: <199510202030.NAA10249@aslan.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199510202030.NAA10249@aslan.cdrom.com> Justin T. Gibbs
writes:
>>1) No, LD_NOSTD_PATH have risk too. Unimplemented LD_PRELOAD have risk
>>too.
>Not unless you also specify an LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
No, LD_NOSTD_PATH treated separately.
>What environment does ld look at during an exec call? The environment
>of the original process? Could we work around this with an execle or
>exect approach?
telnetd assumes in several places that it modify/get master environment,
so it is possible, but require more work and will cause more differences
with standard telnetd development stream.
--
Andrey A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed,
ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead -
http://dt.demos.su/~ache : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead.
RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?YBNH2Ymu88>