Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 23:22:49 +0530 From: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@physics.iisc.ernet.in> To: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org> Cc: David Scheidt <dscheidt@enteract.com>, Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de>, Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ViM vs. Emacs Message-ID: <20000420232249.C7923@physics.iisc.ernet.in> In-Reply-To: <20000420190938.A73632@mithrandr.moria.org>; from nbm@mithrandr.moria.org on Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 07:09:39PM %2B0200 References: <20000420211628.A7696@physics.iisc.ernet.in> <Pine.NEB.3.96.1000420111228.11284B-100000@shell-1.enteract.com> <20000420190938.A73632@mithrandr.moria.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The Vim help claims: Nvi uses the "." command instead of CTRL-R. > Unfortunately, this is not Vi compatible. For example "dwdwu." in Vi > deletes two words, in Nvi it does nothing. > > Anyone want to test that on a 'real vi'? Just tried with the stock vi on DEC unix, Irix, AIX, Solaris. In all of them it deletes two words -- ie the second undoes the undo. Like vim -C, unlike nvi. Rahul. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000420232249.C7923>