Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 11 Mar 2003 18:27:03 -0300
From:      Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Sean Chittenden <seanc@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: your mail
Message-ID:  <20030311212725.21578.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here>
In-Reply-To: <20030311210655.GM79234@perrin.int.nxad.com>
References:  <20030310195323.GA2812@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030310204035.GU79234@perrin.int.nxad.com> <20030311045239.GA4369@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030311112105.GO578@straylight.oblivion.bg> <20030311113835.GK79234@perrin.int.nxad.com> <20030311114110.GP578@straylight.oblivion.bg> <20030311115403.GL79234@perrin.int.nxad.com> <20030311154838.18926.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> <20030311210655.GM79234@perrin.int.nxad.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 01:06:33PM -0800, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > > Well, I think the project is vastly under estimating the value of
> > > being able to generate code, documentation, or other textual bits
> > > based off of XML and that some XML/XSLT processing tools in the base
> > > system would improve the quality of the OS by quite a bit.  It's not
> > > like I'm talking about the python bindings here either, just the xml
> > > and xsl parser and transformation engine.  -sc
> > 
> > 	I understand by your statement that you intend to add further
> > XML to the base system (configuration files, blabla).
> 
> :) Actually, I'm one who'd resist the idea of XML configuration files.
> XML for the textual bits so that after a transformation, the end users
> never know there was any XML involved in the process (read:
> documentation).
> 
> 0 < XML < *

	Perhaps, I should have been clearer there. :) I thought you might
have an intention of having further XML support on the base system aside
from doc building. Well, that is what I would expect since you hinted
that you wanted the XML/XSLT tools in base.
	By the way, I would be with you on the "don't use this for
configuration files". :)
	My take on this, have the appropriate tools in ports for now.
We can re-discuss if it belong in base later on... after we have
something that uses it.

	Regards,

-- 
Mario S F Ferreira - DF - Brazil - "I guess this is a signature."
Computer Science Undergraduate | FreeBSD Committer | CS Developer
flames to beloved devnull@someotherworldbeloworabove.org
feature, n: a documented bug | bug, n: an undocumented feature

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030311212725.21578.qmail>