Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 16:20:01 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 294259] devel/capnproto: Update to 1.4.0 Message-ID: <bug-294259-7788-KByUZaOJL9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-294259-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=294259 --- Comment #13 from Gleb Popov <arrowd@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Daniel Engberg from comment #12) Yes, it is. But we don't have a policy that demands marking ports BROKEN if their test suite does not pass. A regression or a failure in some part of the software does not mean the software became unusable. The problematic code path might not be triggered at all during the normal software usage. Finally, you don't seem to going to debug and fix that problem yourself. In this case you can't deny other users from trying to use it. Please reconsider and remove BROKEN knobs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-294259-7788-KByUZaOJL9>