Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:12:05 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: gahr@FreeBSD.org Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/gdcm distinfo Message-ID: <20100713151205.GB95556@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20100713144735.GK48019@gahrfit.gahr.ch> References: <201007131351.o6DDpcmT044616@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100713144320.GA95556@FreeBSD.org> <20100713144735.GK48019@gahrfit.gahr.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 04:47:35PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 2010-Jul-13, 14:43, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 01:51:38PM +0000, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > > gahr 2010-07-13 13:51:38 UTC > > > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > > > Modified files: > > > devel/gdcm distinfo > > > Log: > > > - Update distinfo (tarball rerolled) > > > > Per Project's bylaws, explicit acknowledgment of the fact that no > > malicious changes were introduced in the updated distfiles is required > > in the commit message. > > Sure, "tarball rerolled" was meant to do just that :) :-) Still, it usually doesn't hurt to ask upstream maintainer why distfile was rerolled and reflect this in commit message, just to be sure. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100713151205.GB95556>