Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 21:02:03 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Merged patches Message-ID: <200001260502.VAA08010@apollo.backplane.com> References: <200001251733.JAA04770@apollo.backplane.com> <200001251637.JAA04226@harmony.village.org> <200001251733.JAA04770@apollo.backplane.com> <200001251736.KAA04666@harmony.village.org> <20000125114820.V26520@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:I do agree that the code for it should be marked so that people using
:our stack for reference can maybe define NOICMP_BANDLIM and get the
:less self-preserving code.
:Imagine if our inetd didn't offer rate limiting unless it was compiled
:with certain defines.
:
:-Alfred
I think for this release ICMP_BANDLIM can simply be enabled in GENERIC.
It would not be wise to go through the code and reverse the sense of
all the conditionals and then have to retest everything to make sure
we haven't bof'd it.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@backplane.com>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200001260502.VAA08010>