Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 22:12:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Blaz Zupan <blaz@gold.amis.net> To: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/linux linux_misc.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907052208310.3770-100000@gold.amis.net> In-Reply-To: <199907051957.NAA57108@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 5 Jul 1999, Warner Losh wrote: > : Let newuname return "Linux" as the OS name and not "FreeBSD". Also, return a > > You may wish to review the archives. This was changed from Linux to > FreeBSD a long time ago. It was done so that people using Netscape, > et al won't bloat the Linux numbers. I don't want to rehash an old thread (and please don't hit me too hard if the comments below have already be talked about), but I completely disagree. What is more important to us: better working linux emulation or reporting the "correct" OS type when visting web sites with Netscape? How can we possibly conclude that just fixing uname(1) will do it? Who says that there isn't a binary installation for some linux software that doesn't use the uname(1) command and so will possibly break because we report FreeBSD as the OS type? I really have to support Marcel here. Blaz Zupan, blaz@amis.net, http://www.herbie.amis.net Medinet d.o.o., Linhartova 21, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9907052208310.3770-100000>