Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 23:14:05 +0000 From: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> Cc: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/nologin Makefile nologin.c Message-ID: <6.0.1.1.1.20040222230357.03ca6ec0@imap.sfu.ca> In-Reply-To: <200402221500.38486.wes@softweyr.com> References: <200402221003.i1MA3PW0024791@repoman.freebsd.org> <6.0.1.1.1.20040222133540.03c296b0@imap.sfu.ca> <200402221500.38486.wes@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 23:00 22/02/2004, Wes Peters wrote: >Wow. Did you read the reams of bikeshedding that have taken place on this >very topic before jumping into this? Yes, I did. And I posted to -current, saying "this is what I'm planning on doing, does anyone object?". And nobody objected. >Don't be surprised if the anti-code-bloat legions call for a backout. As bde has already pointed out (by private email), it's not clear why nologin is in /sbin anyway. I was going to bring this up on -current later this week, but I wonder if the optimal solution would be to have /sbin/nologin compiled without syslog support and /usr/sbin/nologin built from the same source but with syslog support enabled. Colin Percival
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.0.1.1.1.20040222230357.03ca6ec0>