Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 20:56:09 -0400 From: "Michael J. Pelletier" <mjpelletier@mjpelletier.com> To: freebsd-ia64@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Quick question ia64 vs amd 32/64 Message-ID: <1053046569.f0b2ee7da38a9@mail.mjpelletier.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This message is in MIME format. --=_3aa73f7ae9728f97345e60 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_880c74b8de739214b7e634"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This message is in MIME format and has been PGP signed. --=_880c74b8de739214b7e634 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I am currently doing research into up grading the servers here to a 64 bit architecture. I have a couple of questions: 1) Which architecture is currently supported more Intel or AMD? 2) Which architecture will be maturely supported first by FreeBSD? I seemed to find more hardware companies supporting AMD than Intel with resp= ect to motherboard availability. In your option which architecture is better and why? Thank you in advance for your time, -- \__ Michael J. Pelletier __/ \_ Ashland, MA _/ \ USA / ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ --=_880c74b8de739214b7e634 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: PGP Digital Signature Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA+xDcp++kT/uPgVIgRApJNAJ4/PDzzfzkhi6WtF5Uwby4sQEz4EwCgot+z bNy2M/SSHWkUevvJPsNN83w= =QT8/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=_880c74b8de739214b7e634-- --=_3aa73f7ae9728f97345e60--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1053046569.f0b2ee7da38a9>