Date: Fri, 18 Oct 1996 02:10:53 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@cdsnet.net> Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Iozone: local vs nfs drives Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.93.961018020355.25359C-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.95.961017025714.16113R-100000@mail.cdsnet.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Thu, 17 Oct 1996, Jaye Mathisen wrote: > > > I would be interested in the answer to this, I see the same behaviour on > a 2940/Quantum Atlas combo, although the numbers are quite a bit higher. > :) > > In any case, given specifically the issue of news, where most activity is > reading, this is disturbing. IOZONE isn't the benchmark to use to determine news performance. FFS and the file buffering used aren't optimized for reading large files. Regards, Mike Hancockhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.93.961018020355.25359C-100000>