Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 18:55:18 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: Bill Paul <wpaul@skynet.ctr.columbia.edu> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pccard support still works with newbus, right? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9904181854010.85882-100000@herring.nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <199904181716.NAA11215@skynet.ctr.columbia.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 18 Apr 1999, Bill Paul wrote: > I'm currently working on a driver for the Lucent WaveLAN/IEEE 802.11 > PCMCIA adapter, as part of a project for the COMET lab people here > at Columbia. Lucent has a PCMCIA and an "ISA" version of this adapter, > however the ISA version is really just a PCMCIA card fitted into an > add-in PCMCIA controller card that mounts in an ISA slot (i.e. something > that lets you plug PCMCIA devices into a desktop host that doesn't have > any built-in PCMCIA slots). This adapter card has a Vadem 469 chip on it > which, fortunately, is supported by our current pccard code. The system > I'm testing on is running 3.0-RELEASE and I'm reasonably confident my > code will work with 3.1-RELEASE too. As it stands now, I can get the > card probed and attached when I start pccardd, and everything seems > peachy. > > What I need to know is if anybody has tested the pccard support in > 4.0-CURRENT now that all the newbus stuff has been rolled in. If the > pccard support for the x86 still works under 'emulation' using an > ISA device shim, then that's fine. If not... well, then I suppoose > _I'm_ the one who's going to end up testing it. I think it works as well it did before but I haven't personally tested it. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9904181854010.85882-100000>