Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2) 
Date:      Fri, 19 Sep 2025 20:00:07 +0100
From:      Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org
Subject:   standard set (was: Is the base set of packages everything, or not?)
Message-ID:  <1c5d013f-4efa-40d6-845b-dc593bcb6717@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <aM2buaLJrv5llGIg@amaryllis.le-fay.org>
References:  <0814dcd1-e662-4e94-9ac0-ce1cc2fab833@gmail.com> <aM2buaLJrv5llGIg@amaryllis.le-fay.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail 

On 19/09/2025 19:06, Lexi Winter wrote:
> … this might be a good time to either rename set-base …


standard

So,

set-standard


This is partly why <https://reviews.freebsd.org/D52558#1201106>; I needed 
to visualise things. At the time, I could not put my finger on what 
felt/looked/sounded wrong.

Also partly why 
<https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-stable/2025-September/003232.html>; 
I asked about contextual hints in bsdinstall dialogues.

Thanks
help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1c5d013f-4efa-40d6-845b-dc593bcb6717>